The neo cons after a chocking admit of gilt come back to renague what they were saying and intended to say load after january.
Funny all of them claim that what is published is same as what they said over and over before.
Why the anger for repeating it than?
An NRO Symposium on Vanity Fair on National Review Online

I wonder if the definition to WAR CRIMES could be extended to include these bozos
this article is a gem to keep.
I would have said I told you so for every bt I hear from them.
It appears as if the insurgents had 15 years to prepare for this invasion. and as if the arms and weapons are so available.
What to say after Hizbollah showed what could be done after only 5 years preparing for Israel invasion.
Iraquis it appears had 15 years to prepare for this invasion.

Neo Culpa: Politics & Power: vanityfair.com

masajin tunis political prisoners sufferings 6

Haloscan commenting and trackback have been added to this blog.

Too familiar

story

spoilitics has a post about torture

spoilitics: "Presell Pages and Content "

101 Web Marketing Ideas and Tips - Cristian Mezei

spoilitics: Globaleyes: 'Jesus faked his Crucifixion' says Rush Limbaugh

For this male prostitute to say things of this nature is normal otherwise he wont have a job.
what bothers is the number of stations broadcasting his garbage for the past 2 dacades or so.

Axis of Oops! 10/18/06

The War on Terrorism

IRAQ!

Credit Repair in 1-3 Months!
FIRST REFERENCE

Nine Paradoxes of a Lost War - by Michael Schwartz and Tom Engelhardt

Marine Corps Issues Gag Order in Detainee Abuse Case

Iraqi insurgent group invites negotiation - CNN.com

Audio: Bob_and_Tom_-_Telemarketer_Nightmare - Some Catchy Title

Jokes By Random

TIME.com: Inside the CIA's Secret Prisons Program -- Page 1

OUT to Spammers

Spammer to yank Spamhaus domain name

American justice

By Nick Farrell: Tuesday 10 October 2006, 08:32

A US outfit, identified as a spammer, is set to take an British anti-spam operation's domain name with the blessing of the US courts.

According to the Sydney Morning Herald, the Spamhaus Project is about to lose its the domain name to an email marketing company e360 Insight. The project was tried in its absence by a US court which gave a default judgement of $11.7 million to e360.

Since Spamhaus is not bound to pay up because it is based in the UK, so e360 wants to stuff up its operating by taking its only US asset, its domain name.

It can do this because the Internet is still owned by the United States and therefore subject to US property law.

To be fair to e360, the outfit denies that it is a spammer. But suing a British outfit in the US and then seizing its website using a legal loophole is pretty underhanded. If e360 had proved its case before a British judge, then there would have been no problems. The fact it can only win its case in a foreign country when the other side is not represented sort of suggests they have something to fear.

Meanwhile the Spamhaus Project has warned more junk e-mail could be on the way because people will not be able to find its blacklists for a while.

According to Spamhaus, more than 650 million Internet users, including those at the White House, the US Army and the European Parliament, use the Spamhaus' "blacklist". Of course they are over reacting a bit too. Killing off a domain name isn't the same as suspending a website. Spamhaus is used by people who have mail servers and the outfit can pick a new domain name or just use an IP address.

--
firefox protects your computer from harm